Fast bowling – don’t you just love it? Snarling, uprooting stumps and propelling a little leather projectile into batsmen’s lardy bellies. Great fun.
The problem is – they’re a dying breed. If we use 100 wickets as qualification, here are the fast bowlers operating on the 1st January 2000 and their averages at the time compared with the fast bowlers operating now.
Australia
Then:
Glenn McGrath, 266 wickets at 22.88.
Now:
There’s still only Glenn who’s worth talking about. His record has improved with 536 wickets at 21.48, but even he’s not a fast bowler, more a medium-pace robot. Brett Lee’s fast. Brett Lee’s also rubbish.
Bangladesh
Then:
Not a Test-playing nation.
Now:
While a crop of young spinners are coming through the ranks, Bangladesh’s pace bowling is still a distinct weakness. A weakness? It’s dreadful.
England

Then:
Andrew Caddick, 106 wickets at 29.55 and Darren Gough, 135 wickets at 29.07. These were pretty decent times for England. These two were great opening bowlers and we thought that England were going to become the best in the world. We kid ourselves a lot.
Now:
England’s pace bowling is arguably the strongest in the world, featuring Steve Harmison, 154 wickets at 28.71 and Andrew Flintoff, 163 wickets at 31.51. Simon Jones hasn’t yet taken 100 wickets, so strictly speaking, he’s not included and Matthew Hoggard’s average isn’t up to much – plus he’s not fast enough.
India
Then:
Javagal Srinath, 162 wickets at 30.20. We’ve included him because he had to do a good deal of his bowling on unfriendly Indian pitches. He was really quite good; great moustache and hair too; great name for that matter. We’re going to get a cat and call it Javagal.
Now:
Irfan Pathan hasn’t taken many wickets, but we’re starting to regret the 100 wicket minimum, so we’re mentioning him. He’s ‘decent’ at the minute, rather than ‘deadly’.
New Zealand
Then:
Chris Cairns 150 at 29.30.
Now:
Shane Bond has 56 wickets at 20.80 – the lowest average of all current fast bowlers, but his career is almost over before it has begun thanks to a late start and a succession of injuries. Plus the 100 wicket thing again.
Pakistan

Then:
Wasim Akram with 363 wickets at 23.04 and Waqar Younis with 279 wickets at 22.09. Fast-bowling pornography. Every day a masterclass. Waqar’s figures should include broken toes as well as wickets.
Now:
Shoaib Akhtar has 165 wickets at 25.69. Being as Brett Lee is ‘fast-yet-rubbish’, Shoaib is ploughing a lone ‘fast-and-good’ furrow. Good ploughing, you lank-haired psycho.
South Africa
Then:
Allan Donald, 284 wickets at 21.83 and Shaun Pollock, 161 wickets at 20.46.
Now:
Pollock now has 385 wickets but his average has climbed to 22.34 and he’s not fast any more. Makhaya Ntini plays the role of the strike bowler, but 230 wickets at 29.22 isn’t Allan Donald standard. Plus, he doesn’t do the warpaint and mad faces thing like Allan did and he rarely bowls at top pace.
Sri Lanka
Then:
Chaminda Vaas 108 wickets at 29.31
Now:
Chaminda Vaas now has 301 wickets at 28.81. Chaminda’s not all that fast.
West Indies
Then:
Curtly Ambrose, 369 wickets at 21.31 and Courtney Walsh, 410 wickets at 25.23.
Now:
Fidel Edwards, Tino and Jermaine are all pretty quick, but rubbish. It’s like they’ve been watching Brett Lee videos instead of Malcolm Marshall ones.
Zimbabwe
Then:
Heath Streak had taken 111 wickets at 24.56 at this stage in his career. Yes he had. Unbelievable.
Now:
Fast bowlers? No. Cricketers? Not really.
Conclusion
So what’s going on? Quicker scoring rates, better batsmen and too much cricket. We’re not explaining that. This has been too lengthy as it is.
Labels: fast bowling